Japan voices support for US-led strikes against Syria


"I believe that the action taken will have significantly degraded the Syrian regime's ability to use chemical weapons", she said.

The message for Assad, Russia and Iran: Wait long enough and the Americans will go away and the regime can do what it wants in Syria.

The Damascus sky lights up missile fire as the USA launches an attack on Syria targeting different parts of the capital early Saturday, April 14, 2018.

After such harsh rhetoric towards Russian Federation as well as these strikes, Trump can now argue that he simply could not have colluded with Moscow only to bomb its interests in Syria. "Then what do we do?" We hit the sites, the heart of the chem-weapons program.

Russia's defence ministry said on Saturday that the majority of missiles fired during the overnight attack on Syria by U.S., British and French forces were intercepted by Syrian government air defence systems, TASS news agency reported. Her predecessor David Cameron aborted plans to attack Syria in 2013 after he tried, and failed, to secure MPs' backing for airstrikes.

"This collective action sends a clear message that the global community will not stand by and tolerate the use of chemical weapons", May told a press conference.

Trump promised that the strikes wouldn't necessarily be a one-off. Fox News reported that US military strikes would "go forward in Syria" and said the decision was made by Trump on the evening of April 13.

Mr Putin has been a supporter of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, with Russian military forces helping in the Syrian leader's conflict with rebel forces.

British Prime Minister Theresa May said on Saturday she had authorized British forces to conduct precision air-launched cruise missile strikes on Syria to degrade its chemical weapons capability, saying there was no alternative to military action.

The demonstrations broke out early Saturday following a wave of U.S., British and French military strikes to punish President Bashar Assad for suspected chemical attack against civilians.

Trump cancels trip to the Summit of the Americas and Colombia
It would been Trump's first visit to Latin America as president. "When I will not say because I don't like talking about timing". Trump made the decision while entertaining China's president, Xi Jinping, at his private club in Florida.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said the military action against Syria was "legally questionable" and makes real accountability for war crimes less likely.

Trump stressed that "America does not seek" a permanent presence in Syria.

It was an unusual strategy, a departure from the usual US practice of launching surprise attacks.

But Secretary Mattis said that "right now, this is a one-time shot". Trump had been scheduled to attend but stayed in Washington to focus on Syria.

"A combined operation with the armed forces of France and the United Kingdom is now underway".

Syria has denied using chemical weapons.

Anatoly Antonov, Russia's ambassador to the USA, said that "we are being threatened".

The Syrian government and its allies have absorbed a US-led attack, and the targeted sites were evacuated days ago thanks to a warning from Russian Federation, a senior official in a regional alliance that backs Damascus said. At home, Trump faces serious questions about the extent he and members of his administration colluded with Russian President Vladimir Putin to win the 2016 U.S. elections. "They are about how much [the U.S.is] allowed to act unrestrained and how much does he want to demonstrate that he can fight back". There are so many questions rather than answers over the chemical attack itself and the timing makes very little sense on Russian Federation and Assad's part.

Speaking to the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday, Mattis suggested chemical weapons differed from conventional arms in their barbarism. "The military strike was necessary and appropriate in order to preserve the effectiveness of the global ban on the use of chemical weapons", said German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

For some political scientists, that logic represents a slippery slope, where the U.S.is compelled into military action on humanitarian grounds only depending on the type of killing that is occurring.